Prepare for the Nurse Executive Certification Exam. Study with interactive quizzes and multiple-choice questions with detailed explanations. Ensure your success!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What is the goal of comparative negligence in legal terms?

  1. To place all blame on one party

  2. To determine the overall fault in a situation

  3. To identify insurance fraud

  4. To assess liability exclusively

The correct answer is: To determine the overall fault in a situation

The primary goal of comparative negligence is indeed to determine the overall fault in a situation. This legal concept allows for the apportionment of liability among multiple parties based on their respective degrees of fault. By assessing how much responsibility each party holds in an incident, comparative negligence ensures that damages are awarded in proportion to the level of fault attributed to each party involved. This approach promotes fairness by recognizing that more than one party may share the blame for an accident or injury, and it allows plaintiffs to recover damages even if they are found to be partially at fault. The focus on overall fault rather than assigning all blame to a single party is a key feature of this legal doctrine, distinguishing it from systems where liability is not shared or where one party bears all responsibility.